Law Letter Hub Articles

To the Bitter End: What Amounts to an ‘Ending’ of a De Facto Relationship (and its impact in a Wills & Estate Context)

30 September 2025

In Australia, de facto relationships are increasingly common. One in seven Australian adults are in a de facto relationship, and the rate of marriage continues to decline. But while entering a de facto relationship may happen without any formal legal steps or ceremony, the ‘ending’ of a de facto relationship (especially in a legal context) is anything but simple.

When a de facto relationship ends, the consequences extend far beyond the emotional or financial. In the estate planning and administration context, the legal status of that relationship at the time of death can determine whether someone inherits under a will or on intestacy, qualifies to claim superannuation death benefits and life insurance, is a beneficiary or controller of a trust, or has standing to bring a claim under family provision legislation.

For couples who were married, the divorce certificate provides evidence of the end of the parties’ legal relationship as spouses. However, for parties in a de facto relationship, the end is usually not so clean cut nor as easy to prove. This article explores how the law determines whether a de facto relationship has ended, and why timing and clarity matter more than many realise.

Can’t we just do the same thing? The many, many, many terms and tests for de facto relationships!

Estate laws differ greatly from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, and although the term ‘spouse’ may be simple to understand, it is not the same for the term ‘de facto’. Different definitions of de facto relationships and domestic relationships appear in a myriad of legislative provisions, and each Australian jurisdiction has adopted its own definition/test! Some favour the term ‘de facto’ while others use different terms such as ‘domestic partner’ or ‘significant relationship’.1 For ease of reference throughout the balance of this article, unless specifically referring to a relevant jurisdiction, the term ‘de facto relationship’ and ‘de facto partner’ will be used.


How Do You Prove a De Facto Relationship Has Ended?
Unlike marriage, which is dissolved by divorce, there is no single legal mechanism for ending a de facto relationship. The Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) (“the Family Law Act”), and many state-based laws, are silent on exactly how a de facto relationship ends. Instead, courts assess all the circumstances to determine if the mutual commitment to a shared life has ceased.

In Fairbairn v Radecki [2022] HCA 18, the High Court stated that in determining whether a de facto relationship continued to exist meant considering whether ‘necessary or desirable adjustments’ were being made by the couple to allow the continuing of their shared life, explaining that:

“if one party fundamentally acts contrary to the interests of the other in relation to the property of the couple, it may be possible to conclude that the mutual commitment to a shared life has ceased” and ‘a de facto relationship may continue even though the parties physically reside at different locations, and despite one of those parties suffering from (severe) illness’.

The Court went on to explain that the following factors were relevant when determining whether there was a ‘commitment to a shared life together’:

  • the conduct and adjustments (or lack thereof) made by each party to maintain the relationship;
  • the mental state or intention of the parties to continue the relationship;
  • the living arrangements, including whether the couple continued to cohabit or maintain intimacy; and
  • broader relationship factors under s 4AA(2) of the Family Law Act, including finances, children, property, and public perception.

Why does the end of a de facto relationship matter?
When a de facto relationship ends, in a wills & estate context, its impact can be profound:

Wills: In all states and territories other than Queensland, the ‘ending of a de facto relationship’ will not necessarily have any impact on a person’s will. In Queensland, s15B of the Succession Act 1981 (Qld) provides that, unless there is an express contrary intention in the will, the ending of a de facto relationship revokes certain parts of a person’s will.

Recommendation: both parties should review and update their wills to reflect any change in their wishes.

Intestacy: The ending of a de facto relationship has the effect of disentitling the parties to any rights upon intestacy. That is, once a de facto relationship has ended, the parties are no longer eligible under the various intestacy laws in Australia.2

Recommendation: both parties should put a will in place to ensure their wishes are enforced.

Trusts: Unless the trust deed provides otherwise, the ending of a de facto relationship:

  • may remove rights tied to that status (e.g. as a “spouse” which may be defined to include a de facto partner); and
  • may not remove/revoke rights held via an express appointment (either as a controller or beneficiary) or accrued entitlements.

Recommendation: all trusts deeds and exercises of powers of appointments are reviewed and updated to (where possible) reflect any change in wishes.

Enduring Appointments: In all states and territories, the ending of a de facto relationship does not revoke any enduring appointment (such as Powers of Attorney or Enduring Guardian documents).

Recommendation: both parties should update their enduring appointments to reflect any change in their wishes.

Binding death benefit nominations and superannuation death benefits: Unless specifically provided for under the governing rules for the relevant superannuation fund, the ending of a de facto relationship will not automatically revoke a binding death benefit nomination.3 Furthermore, in the absence of a binding death benefit nomination, a former de facto partner may be eligible to receive superannuation death benefits if:

  • the exception that no SISA dependants or LPR can be found applies; and/or
  • the former de facto qualifies as a SISA dependant under another category (e.g. they were in an interdependency relationship with the deceased).4

Recommendation: both parties should update their binding death benefit nominations to reflect any change in their wishes.

Life Insurance: Unless specifically provided for under the life insurance policy, the ending of a de facto relationship will not automatically revoke a life insurance nomination.

Recommendation: both parties should update their life insurance nominations, and review all policies, to reflect any change in their wishes/needs.

Family Provision Claims: A former de facto partner may be eligible to bring a claim against their former de factor partner’s estate, however there are significant differences in family provision laws in each state and territory, which means that a former de facto partner may be an eligible claimant in one jurisdiction but not in another.5 Recommendation: consider whether the former de facto may be an eligible applicant. In determining which laws apply, it is important to consider the domicile of the parties, the location of the property, the time in which an application must be made and whether the applicant meets the definition of an eligible person.

The attached table provides a summary of eligibility and terms across all Australian jurisdictions:

Family Law Proceedings: The ending of a de facto relationship has significant implications for the parties in terms of their entitlement to commence or continue family law proceedings under the Family Law Act:

  • Commencing proceedings: proceedings can only be commenced if both parties are alive at the time of filing (s90SM(8)).
  • Continuing proceedings after one party dies: proceedings can continue by or against the deceased’s legal personal representative (ss90SM(3) and (8)).
  • Proceedings end if both parties die before final orders: If both parties die before a final property order is made, the court has no jurisdiction to continue proceedings (Estate of Mackenzie (Deceased) & Estate of Mackenzie (Deceased) and Anor [2007] FamCA 882 and Whitehouse & Whitehouse [2009] Fam CAFC 207).
  • Maintenance obligations do not survive death: Spousal maintenance and de facto maintenance proceedings cannot be continued against a dead person. Existing maintenance orders stop when a party dies (s90SJ(1)).

Cases
Recent/important cases are:

  • Fairbairn v Radecki [2022] HCA 18;
  • Stanford v Stanford [2012] 247 CLR 108;
  • GFR v SRP [2023] TASSC 15, GFR v SRP [2024] TASFC 2 and GFR v SRP (No 2) [2024] TASFC 6;
  • Corbisiero v NM Superannuation Pty Ltd [2023] FCA 1319; Nguyen v AFCA [2024] FCAFC 77;
  • AFCA determination case number 856722 [2023];
  • Sheen v Hesan; Estate of Zaheer [2023] NSWSC 468;
  • Estate of HRA [2021] QSC 29;
  • Estate of Daniele Claudio Legler [2024] NSWSC 726; (No 2) [2024] NSWSC 908;
  • Costello & Langdon [2024] FedCFamC1A 168; and
  • Lynn v Australian Financial Complaints Authority [2025] FCA 175.

Key Practical Considerations for Advisors and Clients
The ending of a de facto relationship may not be obvious and in law, it may not occur when either party believes it has. This ambiguity means that both clients and practitioners must be proactive.

Key tips are:

  • update/complete estate planning documents promptly;
  • formalise separation where possible;
  • be aware of jurisdictional differences; and
  • record key events and intentions, such as moving out, closing joint accounts, or ceasing financial contributions.
    Even informal written evidence can be helpful in later disputes.

The Relationship May End … But the Legal Consequences Live On
When a de facto relationship ends, it rarely happens with a single, clear act. Yet the legal consequences of that ending can determine who inherits an estate, who controls a trust, and who is left out entirely. As Australia’s family structures continue to shift, understanding the nuances of de facto relationships (and their endings) is more important than ever for estate planning and administration.

For professionals, this area requires vigilance, jurisdiction-specific knowledge, and a willingness to explore the messy human facts behind every legal relationship. For clients, it reinforces a timeless truth: when relationships change, your estate plan must change too.

  1. See s4 Relationships Act 2003 (Tas), s21C Interpretations Act 1987 (NSW), s35 Relationships Act 2008 (Vic), s32DA Acts Interpretation Act 1954 (Qld), s11A, 11B Family Relationships Act 1975 (SA), s13A Interpretations Act 1984 (WA, s169 Legislation Act 2001 (ACT), s3A De Facto Relationships Act 1991 (NT).
  2. See s6 Intestacy Act 2010 (Tas), s105 Succession Act 2006 (NSW), s70B Administration and Probate Act 1958 (Vic), s5AA(b) Succession Act 1981 (Qld), ss 105 and 106 Succession Act 2023 (SA), s15 Administration Act 1903 (WA), s44 Administration and Probate Act 1929 (ACT) and see Schedule 6 Part II Administration and Probate Act 1969 (NT).
  3. See Nguyen v Australian Financial Complaints Authority [2024] FCAFC 77 at [39].
  4. See AFCA case number 856722 at the following link: https://service02.afca.org.au/CaseFiles/FOSSIC/856722.pdf.
  5. See s3A Testator’s Family Maintenance Act 1912 (Tas), ss 57(1)(e) and 59(1)(b) Succession Act 2006 (NSW), ss 90(e), 91, 91A and 3(1) Administration and Probate Act 1958 (Vic), ss 5AA and 41(1) Succession Act 1981 (Qld), ss 115(1)(d) and 115(2) Succession Act 2023 (SA), s7 Family Provision Act 1972 (WA), ss 7(1) and 7(9) Family Provision Act 1969 (ACT) and s7(1) Family Provision Act 1970 (NT).

This article is based on a detailed paper written by Kimberley Martin and delivered at the 2025 Estate and Succession Law Conference in September 2025. If you would like to hear and read more, see the Conference recording and materials here in the Society’s Online recording Store.

September 2025
Kimberley Martin
Director, WMM Law

kimberley.martin@wmmlaw.com.au
linkedin.com/in/kimberley-martin-142358a9.

  • No divorce equivalent – In dispute, Courts decide if a de facto relationship has ended.   In Tasmania, this particularly relevant to former partners’ rights to claim under TFM laws.
  • Big risks in estate planning – Ex-partners may still inherit and/or claim unless documents are updated.
  • Act early – Update wills, enduring appointments, trust documents and superannuation and life insurance nominations as soon as possible after separation.

Author:  Kimberley Martin

Partner:  WMM Law

Search More Articles  Visit the search page to search more articles